A Wolf in Sheep’s Clothing?

In Matthew 7:15, Yeshua (Jesus) says, “Beware of the false prophets! They come to you wearing sheep’s clothing, but underneath they are hungry wolves!”

This warning is stated throughout the Bible, often by Shaul (Paul), mainly as a warning against false teachings. Yet, because so much of Christianity is based on Shaul’s letters and rejects most of God’s commandments, I sometimes wonder if Shaul was a sheep or a wolf?

If you prefer to watch a video, click on this link: Watch the video.

Shaul is a very confusing fellow: he is at once a Pharisee, boasting about his Jewish heritage and training, and he always taught in the synagogues before going to the Gentiles. On the other hand, he also said so many things that appear to be against the Torah, such as regarding food and circumcision (two often repeated issues), one has to wonder where his loyalties really lie.

For the most part, Christian holidays, tenets, canon and ceremonies do not come from the Torah, but are rebranded pagan holidays and man-made traditions. And, because so much of Christianity is based on what Shaul wrote in the letters to his congregations, which were having issues of faith and interpersonal relationship problems, I have come to wonder if the Gentiles were misled by Shaul to form a new religion that goes against God. Is it possible that one of the most world-shattering events in Christianity- Shaul’s revelation of Messiah Yeshua- was really Satan pretending to be Yeshua?

You know, that wouldn’t be something the Prince of Lies wouldn’t do. And, because at that time many of the paganist Gentiles were learning the proper worship of God, sending someone like Shaul to confuse and misdirect them would be a smart thing to do.

After all, look at how successfully his letters have been used to misdirect millions to reject God’s Torah!

Of course, this thought borders on blasphemy, doesn’t it? And the last thing I would ever want to do is insult the Ruach HaKodesh (the Holy Spirit), but we are told to be as wise as serpents, which (to me) means not to avoid questioning anything or anyone who does anything, in any way, to redirect us from obedience to God’s instructions in the Torah.

So, after thinking it over, and asking for guidance from above, I have come to the conclusion that Shaul was, indeed, called by Yeshua to bring the Good News of salvation through Yeshua to all peoples, Jews and Gentiles, alike. BUT…although Shaul was not a wolf, he made it possible for the wolves to easily infiltrate and control the congregations he formed.

And they didn’t start to redirect the sheep away from God’s instructions, which Shaul was trying to get them to learn (at a pace they could handle), until well after Shaul and most every other Jewish disciple and leader of what was (initially) a Jewish sect, was dead and gone.

By the end of the First Century, Jews accepting Yeshua as their Messiah was tapering off, and more and more Gentiles were coming into this sect, and some were wolves who decided that, for both political and (in my opinion) personal reasons, redirected the people into a more casual worship. This new religion they created rejected many of the rules and regulations God gave to us through Moses, and redefined salvation from accepting Yeshua as their Messiah and living a Torah-observant lifestyle to a new religion whose only requirements are to believe in Jesus and love each other.

They turned Yeshua’s teachings from a God-fearing Torah observant lifestyle into a “come-as-you-are” party.

Remember that Shaul told the Corinthians he would be whatever he had to be in order to get the Good News out to people (1 Corinthians 9:20). We see this in his Epistles, each one directed to a specific congregation, addressing their specific problems. This ended up with what was said to one congregation may have been stated differently to another, adding to the confusion his letters usually caused (see 2 Peter 3:16), creating the opportunity for his letters to be misused by the wolves in sheep’s clothing, hiding in his congregations and secretly working for Satan.

Shaul was not the wolf in sheep’s clothing, but in his zeal to get the Good News out to everyone and by “playing to his audience”, he wasn’t consistent. And that inconsistency left the gate open for the wolves to infiltrate and eventually lead his flock away from Yeshua and towards destruction.

Thank you for being here and please remember to subscribe and share.

That’s it for this week, so l’hitraot and (an early) Shabbat Shalom!

Is An Adopted Child Free From the Rules?

Two of the traditional Christian tenets are that when one professes faith in Yeshua (Jesus) as the son of God, they become an adopted child of Abraham, and the other is that as Gentiles, they are not required to obey the Torah, which is only for Jews.

But if they are now adopted children of Abraham, and the “blood” children of Abraham have to obey the Torah, doesn’t that beg the question: “Do the adopted children get to have different rules in the same household?”

If you prefer to watch a video, click on this link: Watch the video.

In his letter to the Galatians, Shaul (Paul) said that when someone belongs to Messiah they are children of Abraham. The direct descendants of Abraham, who are Jews, are required to obey the Torah, so shouldn’t those adopted into our father’s family also have to obey the same rules we do?

Let’s take a hypothetical example: say you are a parent of three children, born to you and your spouse. You raise them to be God-fearing and self-sufficient, as any good parent should. You have rules on how they should treat people, rules for living as a family, and rules for worshiping as a family; these children represent the Jews who first came to accept Yeshua as the Messiah.

Next, you can’t have any more children but because you love kids, you adopt three more kids, all around the same age as your own. Do they get to live a different lifestyle? Do they get to worship differently from the rest of the family? Do they get to refuse the food served at dinnertime to eat what they want to eat? When the family enjoys a day of rest, do they get to change that to a different day? These adopted children would be the Gentiles that came to faith in Messiah sometime around the middle to the end of the First Century, after the main population of Jews who would accept Yeshua began to taper off, and the movement began to mutate to a new religion.

My answer to how these adopted children should be treated would be the same as what happened to these neophyte believing Gentiles making this paradigm shift from paganism to Judaism, which is what they were doing- at least, initially.

The way these newly adopted children should be treated within the family is to be given some leeway, as they were not raised the same way the natural children were. They need an opportunity to learn the rules, slowly, at a pace they can handle, and not be forced to do everything the natural born children have been doing because that would result in one day waking up, and finding the adopted children have run away.

So, you start them off with basic rules they can handle, such as make their bed each morning, help set the table, take out the garbage, and go to worship as a family. As they gain experience in the family, they will learn from watching their siblings all the other rules.

Does this sound like something from the Bible? Well, it is- you can find it in Acts Chapter 15, verses 19-23, when Ya’akov (James) suggested just giving the new Gentile believers a few rules to start with, so as not to place any obstacles in their way. He also says they will eventually learn the entire Torah because it is read at every Shabbat service, demonstrating that the Elders expected these Gentiles to be attending Shabbat worship services with their (now) adopted family, the Jews.

So, what do we have? This hypothetical is really more of an analogy to represent the truth of being an adopted child of Abraham- you are NOT free from the rules of the natural born children, but you are allowed to assimilate into the family at a pace you can handle.

The problem those early believing Gentiles had, which Shaul ran into throughout his ministry, was the legalistic pressure to be completely assimilated immediately into Judaism. His answer was the same that Ya’akov and the Elders agreed with, which is what we did with our hypothetical family- teach them slowly, step-by-step, so they can assimilate easily, and not be scared off.

Here’s what I mean by being scared off: you go to a Pagan worshipper, and explain how they can have eternal joy and blessings on earth by faithfully accepting that there is only one God, and Yeshua is the Messiah and his son.


“OK, that sounds good. What else do I have to do?”
“You must confess your sins and ask forgiveness through Yeshua’s sacrifice, then live a righteous life, giving up the hedonism that you have been doing.”
“Well, I guess for eternal joy I can do that. Anything else?”
“Uh, there is one other, little thing you have to do right away.”
“Yeah? What’s that?”
“You have to let us cut off the top of your penis.”
(total silence)
“That’s it! So, whaddaya say?”
“Um, right, well… Oh gee! Look at the sundial- I didn’t realize it was this late, and I have an important appointment to go to. How about I get back to you later?”

You can see that an all-at-once conversion from paganism to Torah obedience would not work in many cases with the men, while it would probably be easier for the women to accept.

Here’s the point of today’s message: if you are adopted into a family, you are expected to follow the rules of that family; maybe not all at once, but eventually. However, what Christianity has done was to reject the father who adopted them and create a new family on their own. They ran away from the loving parents who adopted them (that would be God and Yeshua), and taught their new family to reject all that their adopted parents had been trying to teach them.

If you ask me, that’s no way to thank someone who accepted you into their family.

Thank you for being here and please remember to subscribe and share these messages.

That’s it for today, so l’hitraot and Baruch HaShem!

Remorse for the Past Prevents Joy in the Future

I am sure you know people who have lost a loved one and just never got past it, allowing it to influence their happiness now. If you ask me, that isn’t honoring the dead.

If you prefer to watch a video, click on this link: Watch the video.

The sad fact is that we never get over losing someone we love, but if we don’t get past it, I’m of the opinion that allowing the loss of someone to detrimentally affect your future happiness is not honoring their memory.

How can I say such a cruel thing? Easily! How many of you, if you were to die, would want the ones you left behind to be sad for the rest of their lives?

Speaking for myself, I would much prefer that they do not mourn for me, because anyone who knows me knows I am secure in the knowledge that I will be with God for all eternity, and really? -who would prefer to be on earth than to be in God’s holy and totally joyful presence forever?

Besides, the truth is we don’t mourn for the dead person, we mourn for ourselves, selfishly concerned about how we will get on without them. And yes- it is selfish, and that’s not a bad thing, really, but it is why we are so sad- the dead person is past all the evil and suffering of this world, so we should be happy for them, right? I mean, when you love someone, you want them to be happy, safe, and unburdened with troubles, don’t you? Well, how much more so do they fit that bill when they are dead?

Don’t get me wrong! I am not saying that you should wish someone you love dead so they can be happy- that’s not right. I am simply saying that when they are dead, they are free from this burdensome life and that should help to console us when feeling their loss.

Look, it’s okay to be sad for yourself that you will no longer have the pleasure of that person’s company, but do not allow it to influence the rest of your life by always having that dark cloud over your head. Rejoice in the fact that you were able to know that person for as long as you did, and rejoice in their being set free from the earthly troubles that we all have to suffer while we are alive.

And if you want to buy into that old story of your loved ones are waiting for you in heaven, or watching over you, well…if it gives you comfort and allows you to continue, then that’s fine. If you ask me, I believe that when we are dead, we wait for Judgement Day and do not hover over the ones we left behind, or act as their guardian angels- we just sleep until the Judgement Day arrives. That’s what the Bible tells us to expect.

I hope that those who are still grieving years later, or who know someone like that, can get this message to them- the ones you have lost do not want you to be unhappy for the rest of your life, so get past it, get on with your life, find the love and joy still out there for you, and honor your dead loved one by living your life to its fullest.

That’s it for this week; please remember to subscribe, buy my books, and share these messages. So, without further ado, l’hitraot and (an early) Shabbat Shalom!

Shaul Never Stopped Being a Torah-Observant Jew

If you go to almost any Bible, and turn to Acts Chapter 9, you will find a caption that says something to the effect of, “Paul converts on the road to Damascus.”

The problem with that caption is that it is a total lie!

If you prefer to watch a video, click on this link: Watch the video.

Christianity has based nearly every tenet and canon on misunderstanding and misusing the letters that Shaul (Paul’s real name) wrote, which were to congregations composed mostly of Gentiles who wanted to be part of this movement that promised eternal joy after they die if they simply accept that this Jewish guy named Yeshua is the son of that Jewish God, Adonai, and that when they do that they can be forgiven of their sins.

I would think one of the first obstacles Shaul had to face is that pagans don’t have sins because what they do is OK with their gods; after all, their gods did it, all the time! Once Shaul could get these Gentiles who wanted something better to listen to him, then he had a starting point.

Most Bibles will lead you to believe that these early Christians (even though that wasn’t a term of affection, at that time) were all Gentiles, the movement accepting Yeshua as the Messiah was initially only Jews. The thousands who were fed, the thousands who accepted him as Messiah at that first Shavuot (Pentecost) after his crucifixion were all Jews, who (for the record) never converted to anything but remained Jews living a Torah-observant lifestyle!

After all, he said he came only for the lost sheep of Israel (Matthew 15:24), and the spreading of his “Good News” didn’t reach Gentiles until a while after he was raised into heaven.

The fact is that until after Yeshua was taken up into heaven, Gentiles were not a significant part of the movement of those Jews who accepted the Messiahship (is that a word?) of Yeshua.

Now, when Shaul was riding to Damascus to persecute the believing Jews, and he got knocked off his high horse (literally, as well as figuratively), he did not convert to a different religion. What happened is simply that he changed his belief regarding Yeshua as the Messiah. That was the only thing that changed, and despite how many people call him a Christian saint or use his letters as justification for ignoring the Torah, Shaul was a Torah-observant Pharisee his entire life and never taught against the Torah.

Prove it, you say? I don’t have to prove it because Shaul, himself, says so!

Let’s take a look at Acts 24:14, where Shaul was making a defense to the Roman governor when he was accused of desecrating the Temple and teaching against the Torah:

But this I do admit to you: I worship the God of our fathers in accordance with the Way (which they call a sect). I continue to believe everything that accords with the Torah and everything written in the Prophets. And I continue to have a hope in God – which they too accept – that there will be a resurrection of both the righteous and the unrighteous.

His admission that he worshipped God in accordance with the “Way” simply meant that he accepted Yeshua was the Messiah God promised to send- there was no church, there was no Christian canon, the New Covenant wasn’t even written yet, and the majority of followers of Yeshua were still Torah-observant Jews.

It wasn’t until near the end of Shaul’s missionary work, sometime around 65 AD, that the number of Gentiles now being called Christians outnumbered the remaining Jews accepting Yeshua as the Messiah.

By the end of the First Century, what started as a Jewish movement had mutated into a totally different religion.

If you ask me, and even if you don’t (because this is my ministry and I’ll say what I believe), the main reason that Christianity has become so completely different from its Judaic roots is because the Gentiles who became the leaders of the movement after all the original, Jewish apostles and shamashim (Hebrew for leaders) died off, decided that all this Jewish stuff would get them in trouble with Rome. You see, there were three rebellions by the Jews in Judea against Roman occupation and rule (the third and last was in 70-73 AD, when the second temple was destroyed), and if these previously “safe” Gentiles now associated with the Jewish population, they were afraid they would also get on Rome’s “Hit List”. So, they changed things around to separate themselves from the Jews, starting with changing the day of the Sabbath, eventually misinterpreting Shaul’s letters to indicate following the Torah was wrong.

Of course, the way Shaul wrote, misinterpreting his stuff was easy.

But, to get back on track, Shaul was a Torah-observant Jew all his life, never converting to anything, especially not what we know today as Christianity. He continually taught how to be Torah observant, but required this conversion from paganism to Judaism to take place only a few steps at a time (which the Elders in Jerusalem agreed with- read Acts 15:21).

His arguments against circumcision and other Jewish forms of worship were never meant to tell these neophyte believers to ignore the Torah, only that they must not succumb to the legalism being forced on them (legalism meaning to obey the Torah as a means of earning salvation). He really never had any issues with Gentiles getting circumcised, so long as the reason was to be faithful to the Torah, and not just to be “correct”.

There are many other places in the Epistles that Shaul wrote that justify the fact he never converted to any other religion, and never stopped being a Torah-observant Jew. The truth is that if Christians want to live and worship as Yeshua (Jesus) did, then they need to get familiar with what God said to do (in the Torah) regarding how to worship him and how to treat each other, because that’s really the way Yeshua lived.

Thank you for being here; don’t forget to subscribe and share these messages. That’s it for today, so… l’hitraot and Baruch HaShem!

God Doesn’t Need a Name

Shakespeare once wrote, “What’s in a name?” His point was that whatever we call something, whether a person or a rose, does not change the nature and essence of that thing.

I believe that this same thought holds true for the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob.

If you prefer to watch a video, click on this link: Watch the video.

There are a lot of people- and my experience with them is that they are exclusively Gentile- who are so obsessed with using God’s name, especially how to pronounce it, that they have created a new, Christianized form of legalism.

Okay, first… what is legalism, really? It is not obedience to the Torah, as Christianity has misinterpreted it, but rather obedience to the Torah IN ORDER TO EARN SALVATION. Legalism is doing what the Torah says to do, just to do it; faith is not a requirement. It is a performance-based salvation, and the reason why it can never work is that no one can be 100% obedient to the Torah 100% of the time.

So, why do I say these “Holy Namers” are being legalistic? It’s because they are so passionate about using the name of God that they have come to worship the name more than the entity it represents.

They insist the name we use for God must be pronounced the way they say it should be pronounced, and more than that, they misuse the term “in the name of..” to mean we should pronounce God’s name, when the proper meaning of that term has nothing to do with the title or name we use to identify God, but rather refers to the reputation and renown of God.

When you drop a name, such as “So-and-so sent me”, we recognize who so-and-so is, but the name isn’t as important as the person behind it, because when that person sent me, he was authorizing me to be there. It was the reputation, power, and authority of so-and-so that is what the person I am talking to recognizes.

So, to get back to Shakespeare’s question, what is a name, really?

According to the Oxford dictionary, a name is…

A word or set of words by which a person, animal, place,
or thing is known, addressed, or referred to.

Okay, that’s the definition, but why do we even need names? The answer is obvious- to identify something or someone as being unique from some other thing or person. I am called Steven so that when someone wants to get my attention, they call out, “Yo! Steven!’ and this way I turn around, but John, Harry, Eleanor, Mary Lou, and everybody else who isn’t named “Steven” will ignore the call.

We need names for the things on the earth to identify one from another, and that is because there are so many things that are similar, such as the many different types of flowers or animals, or people, who without names we could never be able to effectively identify or communicate with.

But what about God? I mean, how many of him are there?

There’s only one, and he is totally unique in the Universe, so there is, technically, no need for a name for him because he cannot be anyone or anything else other than…God.

And God, itself, is not a name as much as a title, like El Elyon (God on High), or Adonai (Lord) or HaShem (The Name) or…well, you get the point. He is known by his title, position, and authority, and even the Tetragrammaton, those 4 letters (יהוה) can’t be pronounced correctly because we have no idea which vowels are to go where.

No matter who says they know the true pronunciation, they can’t.

God says how he wants us to know him in Exodus 3:15 (CJB):

God said further to Moshe, “Say this to the people of Isra’el: ‘Yud-Heh-Vav-Heh (Adonai), the God of your fathers, the God of Avraham, the God of Yitz’chak and the God of Ya‘akov, has sent me to you.’ This is my name forever; this is how I am to be remembered generation after generation.

Yes, the 4 letters are there, but (as I said) we don’t know how to pronounce them, so we should use the next description God gave us to identify him, which is the God of our fathers, etc.

People need to make God into what they want him to be in order to feel more comfortable. Because we are self-centered and sinful beings, we can’t raise ourselves to God’s level, so we have to bring him down to our level, at least, a little bit, so we feel more comfortable in our relationship with him.

One way to do this is to give him a name so he is more like the rest of us.

And the ones who can’t accept that he is above all things, including needing a name to identify him as separate from others like him (which don’t exist), insist on how to pronounce that name, and to use it every, single time the word “name” appears in the Bible, ignoring the proper meaning of the term “in the name of” or “call on the name..”

What I am saying is that legalism isn’t dead in modern Christianity, they have just redirected it from the Torah to God’s name. It reminds me of what happened to the brass snake Moses made, which went from a symbol of God’s protection to being worshiped as a god, itself.

Today’s message, in a nutshell, is this: don’t worship the name used for God, worship God.

He knows your mind and heart, and whichever name you know to mean the one who told us to know him as the God of our fathers, the God of Abraham, the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob will not be confused or upset when you use a name that you know to be him.

Thank you for being here and please don’t forget to subscribe and share these messages.

That’s it for today, so l’hitraot and Baruch HaShem!

Yeshua is Not Really Our Savior, He is the Messiah

Okay, okay, I know…everyone calls Yeshua (Jesus) the Savior, but what does the “savior” do?

When we define a savior, Yeshua doesn’t completely fill the bill.

If you prefer to watch a video, click on this link: Watch the video.

A savior is someone who saves others, mostly used when describing keeping someone from danger or from losing their life.

In the case of Yeshua, he allegedly saves us from the second death, the condemnation to Sheol (hell) as the punishment for our sinful life. But I say we need a better understanding of “being saved” in a spiritual sense.

Let’s start by clearing this very important issue up, once and for all- God forgives sins, not Yeshua.

Yes, Yeshua was given authority to do that on the earth (Matthew 9:6), but once his role as the sacrificial lamb of God was completed, he was resurrected and is now sitting at the right hand of God, where he serves not as forgiver of sin but as our Intercessor with God.

Think about this: an Intercessor is someone who is intervenes on the behalf of someone else. As such, the intercessor has no power to do anything, other than act in a way to help the one he is interceding for. Since Yeshua is our intercessor (Hebrews 7:25), then he- by definition- is not the one who forgives our sins. Indeed, when we accept Yeshua as our Messiah, he will then stand between us and God, interceding on our behalf to allow us to enter into God’s presence.

When we accept Yeshua as the Messiah (not as God!), and ask forgiveness FROM GOD by means of the innocent blood Yeshua shed for us (in place of bringing an animal to the temple, which no longer existed after 73 AD), we can be forgiven of our sins.

First off, we need to understand that by having our sins forgiven we won’t go to Sheol when judged at Judgement Day; and that is what it means to be “saved”.

Got it, so far? Good- let’s continue…

Yeshua’s sacrifice created the shedding of innocent blood, and when we accept Yeshua as our Messiah, we can ask forgiveness of sin by means of that shed blood. You could say, in a way, that Yeshua saves us because he provided the means for our forgiveness, but in reality, he only provided the way to be saved.

Ultimately, it is God who forgives our sins, and THAT is what saves us.

I would also like to point out that Mashiach, the Hebrew word for Messiah, means “anointed one”. Yeshua (which means “salvation of God”) was anointed by God (at his baptism by Yochanan) to be the Messiah God promised to send. The role of the Messiah was to live a sinless life and die to provide the innocent blood necessary for the forgiveness of sin (Leviticus 17:11; Hebrews 9:22). And, when we faithfully accept that Yeshua is the Messiah, we are able to call upon that blood when asking God to forgive us, which is the way we are saved.

So, it isn’t technically correct to call Yeshua the savior because he isn’t the one who forgives our sins, which is the way we are saved. Yeshua is the Messiah, God is our savior because not only did he provide the Messiah (the only way to be forgiven of sin after the temple was destroyed), but God is the ONLY one who forgives our sins, saving us from Sheol.

Look at it this way: a certain medicine can save your life from a disease, but is it the medicine that is the real savior, or the one who created the medicine? We may say “This medicine saved my life”, but it is that the one who created the medicine who is the real savior.

By the way, one little thing I would like to point out about the use of the word “savior”- it is a Christian term rebranding Jesus in order to further separate him from his Jewish role as the anointed one of God. Interpreting “Maschiach” as “Savior” has become standardized, but not because it is correct, only because for centuries that is what people have been told it means. Just another traditional Christian lie about who and what the real Messiah is.

That’s it for this week, so l’hitraot and (an early) Shabbat Shalom!

Is the Word of the Lord a Boomerang?

We have all heard that the word of the Lord never returns unfulfilled, but does the word ever not return?

If you prefer to watch a video, click on this link: Watch the video.

Let’s look at the entire statement, Isaiah 55:10-12 (CJB):

“For just as rain and snow fall from the sky and do not return there, but water the earth,
causing it to bud and produce, giving seed to the sower and bread to the eater;
so is my word that goes out from my mouth — it will not return to me unfulfilled;
but it will accomplish what I intend, and cause to succeed what I sent it to do.”

OK, someone may say that rain and snow which falls to the earth does return eventually through evaporation. Yet, for the rain or snow that is absorbed by the earth and ends up as sustenance for the plants or animals, that doesn’t really return, does it? That is the rain and snow that accomplishes what God sent it to do- bring life.

We know that God sent his word into the world, to the Jews first and then to the rest of the nations (Goyim), instructing us all how to worship him and how to treat each other, yet there are so many who haven’t made any adjustment to their sinful lives, so what’s up with that? How can God say his word never returns unfulfilled for the purpose he sent it, yet here we have an undeniable truth- most of the world has ignored it, including most of the Christian religions who profess to worship him!

It seems we have a real conundrum: we know that what God says he will do, will be done. Period. But yet, here we have his word sent to the world, but his word doesn’t seem to be accomplishing what God sent it to do.

I could use a Predestination view (which, for the record, I do not believe in) and say that those who do not hear the word were never meant to hear it, and that nicely answers the problem of how it can not return unfulfilled.

But I don’t think that is the real answer.

I am thinking of what Yeshua told his Talmudim as he sent them into the world (Luke 10), when he said as they come to a house, to give it their “Shalom”, and if the house returns their shalom, to stay there. That meant that if the place they came to was open to hearing the word, then their shalom, i.e., the message of peace, will return to them, meaning that its purpose to teach them how God wants them to live, will not be unfulfilled.

God’s word is to teach us how to be righteous in his eyes; however, when his Torah (meaning teachings) fall on deaf ears, it is the shalom that was not returned.

What I am trying to say is that when God’s word is has been spoken to those who are willing to listen to it, it returns to God fulfilled. However, if the word sent falls on deaf ears, it will not return to God.

The fly in the ointment is Free Will- God’s word is life eternal, but for those who refuse to listen, the purpose God sent his word to fulfill will not be accomplished. Not because of any inability of God’s word to accomplish his purpose, but because of our ability to reject that word.

So there’s the answer to the conundrum: the only word that returns to God is the word that has fulfilled its purpose. The word that is ignored does not return to God, but like rain falling in the ocean, or snow falling on a mountaintop already full of snow, it has no impact or change to what is already there.

God’s word is a powerful medicine that can cure any disease, but if it is not taken by the person who is sick, its purpose is unfulfilled.

Thank you for being here, and please remember to subscribe and share these messages. That’s it for today, so l’hitraot and Baruch HaShem!

What Paul Really Meant When He Called the Torah a Guardian

Depending on the version you read, Shaul refers to the Torah (Galatians 3:24) as either a guardian, custodian, or even as a schoolmaster (KJV).

But whatever which way that Greek word was interpreted, it shows that the Torah was all we had at that time to teach us how to be righteous in God’s eyes.

If you prefer to watch a video, click on this link: Watch the video.

To understand this passage, as well as anything we read in the Bible, we need to ensure we are looking at the entire context of what was being written, to include what comes before and after the passage, and to interpret it within the context of the entire paragraph, letter or book, who wrote it and to whom, and why.

Briefly, Shaul is writing to the Galatians who are under pressure from the Jewish population to make total conversion to Judaism in order to be saved. This strict adherence to the letter of the law, in lieu of faith, is what we know as “Legalism”. Shaul was trying to convince the Gentile Believers that they needed to be faithful, first and foremost, because following the Torah (which is too often incorrectly thought of as being “under the law”) was only to be the way until the Messiah came.

In other words, to put it without all the “Jewish logic” that Shaul uses (Jewish logic is my term for how we Jews argue- we will tell you everything something is NOT before we tell you what it is), the Torah was given to us to teach us (as a guardian or schoolmaster) how we are to act in order to be righteous in God’s eyes, and thereby to be given eternal life. i.e., to be “saved”.

The point Shaul was making is not that the Torah was not needed anymore because through Yeshua we can be saved, which is the traditional Christian use of this passage, but rather that through the faithful trusting in Yeshua as the Messiah, we can be saved not just from death, but from our failure to obey the Torah completely.

You see, the bottom line (unspoken in so many ways) is that the Torah IS life eternal, and that was proven when Yeshua was raised from the dead, which was the result of his having lived in 100% obedience to the Torah for 100% of his life.

Yeshua was the epitome of Torah obedience, which is why he never saw decay and was resurrected to eternal life in God’s presence. The truth is, people, if any one of us could do that, then we would also be resurrected to eternal life.

The problem us is that no one can do that, which is the very reason God sent us the Messiah. Through our faithful acceptance that Yeshua is the Messiah God promised, we can find forgiveness of sin.

Look- being righteous in God’s eyes can never happen if we are stained with sin, and the way we are saved is not really just through faith in Yeshua, but through being forgiven of sin. The faith in Yeshua is the means by which we are forgiven, and being forgiven is the path to eternal life.

Yeshua is not salvation: he is the means by which we can be forgiven of our sins, and when we are no longer stained with sin, we can live in God’s presence.

Now, as for the guardian no longer being necessary, let’s think about what a guardian does: he or she guards us (DUH!), but from what? The guardian guards us from making mistakes, from being hurt or hurting others, and prepares us (as a schoolmaster) to know what we need to know in order to survive in the world when we are on our own.

When you were in school (under a guardian), you learned about the world, you learned about science, social studies, history, art, etc. When you graduated, you were no longer under that guardian, but let me ask you- when you were no longer under the guardian, did you reject and ignore everything that guardian taught you?

This is what Shaul meant when he said that through faith in Yeshua, the guardianship under the Torah was not needed anymore because through Yeshua we could find the one thing that the Torah, alone, offered us to be saved: forgiveness through the sacrificial system.

That system didn’t exist after (approx.) 70 AD, when the temple in Jerusalem was destroyed, and from that moment on, the only path to God (meaning being able to be cleansed of sin) was through the forgiveness we receive by means of Yeshua’s sacrifice.

When we leave school, or reach legal majority at which time we no longer require a guardian, what we learned from our experience under that guardian is (hopefully) going to be the foundation for a successful and meaningful life. Proverbs 22:6 says,

Train up a child in the way he should go; even when he is old he will not depart from it.

The same is true for the Torah as our guardian- it is to teach us the way to go, specifically the path to salvation, and so under the Torah we learned how to live, how to worship God, and how to treat each other. Certainly, Shaul would never have meant that all of that was to be rejected in lieu of faith in Yeshua!

The Torah teaches us all that we need to know to be faithful to God, and to live a righteous life. Yeshua taught us the deeper, spiritual meaning of the Torah, fulfilling not so much the law as the new covenant God made through Jeremiah (Jer. 31:31), which said that he would write his Torah on our hearts. Yeshua taught us how to have the very “heart” of the Torah on our hearts, but never to ignore it; neither did any of the disciples or apostles teach to ignore the Torah.

The Torah was our guardian, teaching us what we need to know to be righteous, and it is still a valid and necessary to anyone who professes to believe and worship the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob as it was when God first gave it to us through Moses. The only thing that as changed is how we receive forgiveness: because we cannot do so under the Torah (no temple to bring our sacrifice), we now find that forgiveness of sin through the sacrifice Yeshua made, and that means of forgiveness (which is, again, how we are saved) is only available to those who accept Yeshua as their Messiah, the one God promised to send.

That’s how it works- the Torah as our guardian taught us how God wants us to worship him and treat each other, and just like you do not reject or ignore all that you were taught in school, the Torah is as valid today for everyone worshipping God as it has always been.

Yeshua is the means by which we can be forgiven when we sin, replacing the need to bring an animal to the temple, but he did not replace the Torah, or the need to be obedient to God’s commandments.

That’s it for this week, so l’hitraot and (an early) Shabbat Shalom!

Are You Confident or Are You Just Comfortable?

Do you believe what you believe? In other words, are you totally confident that what you believe is true? If so, are you willing to question that belief, to the point of trying to prove to yourself that you are wrong?

If you prefer to watch a video, click on this link: Watch the video.

I have spoken to many people over the years who have a strong faith, or, at least, that is what they say, but when I question what they believe by bringing up examples from the Bible to show what they have been taught is not correct, they refuse to listen. They say their faith is strong, but apparently it isn’t strong enough to stand up to questioning.

If you believe something is true and biblically validated, then you should be able to argue for that belief, and not be afraid to have it challenged. In fact, you should challenge it, yourself, if for no other reason than to confirm that you are correct.

In a case where someone is not willing to challenge or stand up for what they believe, with anything other than the typical “party line”, then I believe that they are more comfortable than confident.

If you have been brought up with a certain truth, told to you by those who you have loved and respected your whole life, and you have been indoctrinated into the ceremonies and tenets of that belief system, then it becomes very comfortable. So much so, that the idea of learning something totally different, or worse yet- that what you have been told is wrong (oy gevalt!)- you will reject the idea completely, without even wanting to hear any arguments.

So, when you run into someone who strongly believes something is true that you strongly believe is not true, first challenge yourself to make sure what you think it is, is what it is. Then, if they are willing to challenge their belief, you can help them along with the reasons why you believe. For myself, and I recommend this approach, I never tell anyone what to believe, only what I believe and why. If it makes sense to them, then we are in agreement and maybe, just maybe, I have helped someone to get closer to God and his Messiah.

And you know what? There have been times in the past when it has helped me realize where I was wrong.

Always be willing to challenge what you believe because if you aren’t willing to do that, then I think you don’t really believe, as much as you are just comfortable with what you know, and God forbid you should do something or hear something that takes you out of that comfort zone.

Being in your comfort zone will always feel good, but the real definition of a comfort zone is stagnation; people who are in a spiritually static condition will never be closer to God or better, in God’s eyes. So, unless you are certain that you are perfect in God’s eyes, you might want to consider getting out of that easy chair called “religion” and making sure that what you believe is biblically correct.

That’s it for today. Thank you for being here, and please remember to subscribe and share these messages. So, l’hitraot and Baruch HaShem!

It Was Never Either Faith or Works

Too often I have heard people say that all they need to be saved is faith in Christ, but then James said that faith without works is dead.
They say Jesus did away with the law, but if that is true, doesn’t that lead to the conclusion that through Jesus, there is only lawlessness?

So what IS the relationship between faith and works?

If you prefer to watch a video, click on this link: Watch the video.

Faith is believing, simple as that. So, when someone says that they believe in Yeshua what do they mean?

My experience is that nearly everyone who says that has no idea what they mean, and can’t come up with any better explanation than that they believe he is the Messiah.

So what? Every demon in hell, and the guy in the red suit with the pitchfork also believe he is the messiah, so are they saved? Do they go to heaven?

I don’t think so!

Faith is believing without proof (Hebrews 11:1), but true faith cannot be invisible. As James said, true faithfulness in the belief Yeshua is the Messiah means you must also faithfully believe in God, and that means also faithfully believing that God is in charge, the ultimate authority in the Universe.

With me so far?

So, if God is the ultimate authority, and we believe that, then why does Christianity base all its tenets and laws on what Shaul (Paul), a human being, says?

The only answer is that they never really had faith in God, but rather placed their faith in a human being because (this is what I believe!) what he said was easier to do than what God said.

And people are still that lazy, today, which is proven by how many people come against my messages of Torah obedience being for everyone who professes to believe in God, as being wrong.

If you truly believe that God is in charge, and the ultimate authority, and that he loves his children, then you have to accept that he gave us the Torah (first to the Jews to learn, then as his nation of priests- see Ex. 19:6– to bring to the Goyim/Nations) for our own good.

The Torah is where God, himself, directly instructs us how he wants us to worship him and how he wants us to treat each other. Have you ever considered how Christianity can say it is God-fearing and God-ordained, when it has, for millennia, taught to ignore the Torah, God’s own instructions?

It’s really very simple, but very hard for Gentiles to accept- faith and works cannot be exclusive but must be inclusive. Works without faith is legalism; it is a performance-based salvation and, as such, will never be successful.

On the other hand, faith without any demonstration of that faith, is just so many words, and I learned this truth long ago: people don’t mean what they say, they mean what they do.

Jimmy had it right all along: if you are truly faithful to God, and truly faithfully believe Yeshua is the Messiah and that he taught us the true, spiritual meaning of the Torah, then you MUST be obedient to the Torah as the demonstration of your professed faith.

You can make up all the excuses that Christianity has taught its followers for millennia, but I tell you- absolutely- that when you come to face God at Judgement Day (which we will ALL have to do), and tell him that you did everything those men at your church told you to do, I won’t speak for God, but I am sure he will reply with something to this effect:

“I understand, my child, that you did what they told you to do, but it is what I say that counts!”

Thank you for being here; that’s it for this week so l’hitraot and (an early) Shabbat Shalom!